On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 16:12 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > On 4/27/07, Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My opinion is that we ought to not mandate the use of Pod coverage > > tests, simply because for our purposes it doesn't really matter what > > their result is. If they're present, we should conditionalize the > > tests (e.g. %_with_pod_tests magic or some such), but not insist on > > them by default. > > So, to follow up to myself here, given the lack of comments I'm > inclined to approve 237883 without insisting on Test::Pod::Coverage > due to T::P::C not testing the _functionality_ of the package. You don't want to know about the bugs and deficits your packages suffer from? <biting sarcasm> But then let's be consequent and mandate disabling all testsuites, avoids a lot of fuzz and lets the distro appear "free of bugs". <biting sarcasm/> > One > last chance to scream :) YELL! Ralf
