On 4/27/07, Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My opinion is that we ought to not mandate the use of Pod coverage
tests, simply because for our purposes it doesn't really matter what
their result is. If they're present, we should conditionalize the
tests (e.g. %_with_pod_tests magic or some such), but not insist on
them by default.
So, to follow up to myself here, given the lack of comments I'm
inclined to approve 237883 without insisting on Test::Pod::Coverage
due to T::P::C not testing the _functionality_ of the package. One
last chance to scream :)
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
