Re: [Bug 230608] missing config.h in latest -14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:44 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote:
> "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:31 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> > The new spec moves all of: ExtUtils::MakeMaker, ExtUtils::Embed, CPAN,
> > and Test::Harness into devel, along with the items that depend on them
> > (perlcc, perlivp, h2xs, libnetcfg). I put all of Encode back in base,
> > because it seemed like something that might get used by runtime perl
> > bits, but if you disagree, I'd like to know (I've not made up my mind
> > either way on that one).
> 
> This seems like the right split to me - I'm still a little nervous about
> CPAN, but I think after people get used to it, it makes sense, and yum
> install perl(CPAN) should get it for them.  I wonder if explicitly
> providing something called 'cpan' would help - so 'yum install cpan'
> would work as well.
The FPG mandates perl-CPAN as package name for the module if you would
want to split CPAN into a separate package (perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker also
would make sense).

However, pay attention to the versions being involved: 
A perl-CPAN package would be required to carry the version of the CPAN
module, not the version of the perl-rpm.

Unfortunately choosing different "versions" from inside of one spec
isn't easily doable from inside of one spec.

Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux