Re: spring-* vs springframework-*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2013 01:17 AM, Michal Srb wrote:
> The problem is that this upstream has a lot of projects. "Spring 
> Framework" is just one of them. Another is "Spring Security", "Spring 
> Retry", "Spring Batch", ... [1]. On the other hand, all the projects 
> have "springframework" in their groupId (e.g.: 
> "org.springframework.security").

This is why I wish that all java packages used <groupId>-<artifactId> in
the package name.

The policy seems to be to drop the tld, and change every `.' to `-'.
Following those rules, the package name should probably be
springframework-security-<artifactId>.

--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux