On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Excerpts from Andy Grimm's message of Fri Sep 02 20:42:49 +0200 2011: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > There's apparently precedent for bundling POMs: >> > >> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2504 >> >> Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this >> thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs >> related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the >> "flava" POMs aren't included. Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated >> to 2.0 ? > > So this doesn't get lost: file a bug in the bugzilla. I'll update it. I > assume you'd like to have this also in F16, correct? Yes. I have filed this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736161 > >> And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is >> referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system, >> it's not packaged anywhere that I could see. I didn't think the child >> POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have >> misunderstood this. Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent >> packaged. > > You were correct in thinking that parent poms are required. We have it > in package maven2-common-poms. This is one ugly pom-only package that > used to contain 100s of POM files. We cut it down significantly, but > there are still things in there. If you create a new parent package, > that is currently contained in maven2-common-poms either file a bug to > have old POM removed or ping me on IRC and I'll do it. I see, I just didn't find the right directory of POMs. I have created apache-parent and filed a review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=736069 I noted in the review request that the old POM should be removed from maven2-common-poms once this package is released. >> --Andy >> >> > On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: >> >> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it >> >> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of "parent" >> >> POMs. Something like: >> >> >> >> apache-parent >> >> genesis-parent >> >> genesis-default-flava >> >> genesis-java5-flava >> >> >> >> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes >> >> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms" together? I can go >> >> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon, >> >> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all >> >> just be bundled in a single package. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> --Andy >> >> -- >> >> java-devel mailing list >> >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel >> >> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > java-devel mailing list >> > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel >> > > > -- > Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> > Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno > > PGP: 7B087241 > Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com > > -- > java-devel mailing list > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel > -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
