Excerpts from Andy Grimm's message of Fri Sep 02 20:42:49 +0200 2011: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's apparently precedent for bundling POMs: > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2504 > > Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this > thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs > related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the > "flava" POMs aren't included. Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated > to 2.0 ? So this doesn't get lost: file a bug in the bugzilla. I'll update it. I assume you'd like to have this also in F16, correct? > And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is > referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system, > it's not packaged anywhere that I could see. I didn't think the child > POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have > misunderstood this. Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent > packaged. You were correct in thinking that parent poms are required. We have it in package maven2-common-poms. This is one ugly pom-only package that used to contain 100s of POM files. We cut it down significantly, but there are still things in there. If you create a new parent package, that is currently contained in maven2-common-poms either file a bug to have old POM removed or ping me on IRC and I'll do it. > --Andy > > > On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: > >> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it > >> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of "parent" > >> POMs. Something like: > >> > >> apache-parent > >> genesis-parent > >> genesis-default-flava > >> genesis-java5-flava > >> > >> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes > >> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms" together? I can go > >> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon, > >> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all > >> just be bundled in a single package. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> --Andy > >> -- > >> java-devel mailing list > >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel > >> > >> > > > > -- > > java-devel mailing list > > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel > > -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
