On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There's apparently precedent for bundling POMs: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2504 Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the "flava" POMs aren't included. Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated to 2.0 ? And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system, it's not packaged anywhere that I could see. I didn't think the child POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have misunderstood this. Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent packaged. --Andy > On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: >> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it >> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of "parent" >> POMs. Something like: >> >> apache-parent >> genesis-parent >> genesis-default-flava >> genesis-java5-flava >> >> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes >> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms" together? I can go >> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon, >> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all >> just be bundled in a single package. >> >> Thanks. >> >> --Andy >> -- >> java-devel mailing list >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel >> >> > > -- > java-devel mailing list > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel > -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
