Re: Secondary review of a Java package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/10/2010 08:25 PM, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes:
>> Warnings or errors?  gcj uses ecj under the hood, which is more
>> verbose by default
> 
> Warnings.  Indeed, mostly about generics, and some odd unused
> variables.  If it is safe to ignore them, I could do that.
> 
> I don't loose anything else in using the GCJ rather than OpenJDK
> compiler?  Does the quality of the code produced differ in any
> relevant way, or so?

No, it won't make any difference to OpenJDK users.  All you'd be doing
is helping those who use gcj.

Andrew.
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux