On 08/10/2010 11:10 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> >> The sensible rule everyone seems to use is that if adding gcj support >> doesn't require much effort, add it. If not, don't. > > As gcj is at 1.5 JVM level there is no point in having gcj support for > packages that require Java 1.6. Yes, obviously. I don't quite understand the point you're making, though: clearly if a package requires 1.6 then adding gcj support requires much effort, so don't add it. Andrew. -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
