Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello again, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:13:24AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: >> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:58:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> 1) whether one obsoletes the other >>> 2) given the requesting package, whether the arch matches >> I believe this is the cause: gcj is still i386, and thus does not >> match the requesting brltty.i586. >> >> I can verify this by a rebuild of java-1.5.0-gcj, [...] > > verified. The problem was that java-1.5.0-gcj escaped the F-11 Mass > Rebuild. I worked around the bug that prevented the rebuild, and now > gcj is preferred on all archs again, as you can check here: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1350608 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1350613&name=root.log OK, so we should be back to the status quo ante. Thanks, Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
