Re: The default java alternative?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:01:22PM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> According to Stepan, though, in koji he's getting the latter (OpenJDK)
> for x86 and x86_64 and the former for non-x86*.

no, I'm getting openjdk for x86 and gcj for all other archs,
including x86_64.
The inconsistency on x86 multiarch is what first brought my attention
to this.

Actually, I think I know the answer now:`

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:58:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 1) whether one obsoletes the other
> 2) given the requesting package, whether the arch matches

I believe this is the cause: gcj is still i386, and thus does not
match the requesting brltty.i586.

I can verify this by a rebuild of java-1.5.0-gcj, I'm going to try
this later today.

Have a nice day,
	Stepan

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux