Re: The default java alternative?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello again,

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:13:24AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:58:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > 1) whether one obsoletes the other
> > 2) given the requesting package, whether the arch matches
> 
> I believe this is the cause: gcj is still i386, and thus does not
> match the requesting brltty.i586.
> 
> I can verify this by a rebuild of java-1.5.0-gcj, [...]

verified.  The problem was that java-1.5.0-gcj escaped the F-11 Mass
Rebuild.  I worked around the bug that prevented the rebuild, and now
gcj is preferred on all archs again, as you can check here:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1350608
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1350613&name=root.log

Stepan Kasal

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux