Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:11:18 am Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Here is the original thread: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2008-November/msg000 >> 21.html >> >> So, shall we or shall we not? >> >> * Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Andrew Overholt wrote: >>>> Back when we wrote the initial Java packaging guidelines, we said that >>>> packagers *should* include GCJ AOT bits. Should we remove this >>>> requirement for Fedora 11 and beyond? >>>> >>>> [...] >>> This is a bit premature. We still don't have the OpenJDK JIT for PPC and >>> ARM arches. We're working hard on it but it's not ready yet for >>> prime-time. Without the JIT, OpenJDK is crushingly slow on these arches. >> Any progress on these parts? > > http://gbenson.net/ <-- That's the guy working on it. It seems to be making a > lot of progress, but I don't know if it's ready to ship (probably not?). Lots of progress, not yet ready. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
