On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:11:18 am Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Here is the original thread: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2008-November/msg000 >21.html > > So, shall we or shall we not? > > * Andrew Haley wrote: > > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > Back when we wrote the initial Java packaging guidelines, we said that > > > packagers *should* include GCJ AOT bits. Should we remove this > > > requirement for Fedora 11 and beyond? > > > > > > [...] > > > > This is a bit premature. We still don't have the OpenJDK JIT for PPC and > > ARM arches. We're working hard on it but it's not ready yet for > > prime-time. Without the JIT, OpenJDK is crushingly slow on these arches. > > Any progress on these parts? > > > Orcan http://gbenson.net/ <-- That's the guy working on it. It seems to be making a lot of progress, but I don't know if it's ready to ship (probably not?). Regards, -- Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
