Here is the original thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2008-November/msg00021.html So, shall we or shall we not? * Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > Back when we wrote the initial Java packaging guidelines, we said that > > packagers *should* include GCJ AOT bits. Should we remove this > > requirement for Fedora 11 and beyond? > > > > [...] > > This is a bit premature. We still don't have the OpenJDK JIT for PPC and > ARM arches. We're working hard on it but it's not ready yet for prime-time. > Without the JIT, OpenJDK is crushingly slow on these arches. Any progress on these parts? Orcan -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
