* Jack Tanner <ihok@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2007-11-26 16:34]:
> Andrew Overholt <overholt@...> writes:
>
> > Yeah, although your options are slightly different, eclipse.ini achieves
> > the same thing. The problem is that the defaults weren't being read
> > because they were in /usr/share/eclipse/eclipse.ini when they should
> > have been in /usr/lib{64}/eclipse/eclipse.ini. A forthcoming 3.3.1.1
> > update will fix the defaults.
>
> Realistically speaking, is eclipse-3.3.1.1-10.fc9.src.rpm, which
> builds successfully on all arches, about to get tagged as an update
> (or update-testing) for F8? Or is some more work going to happen
> before an update is possible?
No, I just haven't gotten around to submitting the update :)
Andrew
Attachment:
pgp41KTGqL7UN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
