Andrew Overholt <overholt@...> writes: > Yeah, although your options are slightly different, eclipse.ini achieves > the same thing. The problem is that the defaults weren't being read > because they were in /usr/share/eclipse/eclipse.ini when they should > have been in /usr/lib{64}/eclipse/eclipse.ini. A forthcoming 3.3.1.1 > update will fix the defaults. Realistically speaking, is eclipse-3.3.1.1-10.fc9.src.rpm, which builds successfully on all arches, about to get tagged as an update (or update-testing) for F8? Or is some more work going to happen before an update is possible? -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list