Re: Why does eclipse now require lucene-devel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-10 08:28]:
> On 10/02/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >So you've been using the JPackage lucene with Fedora Eclipse?
> >Interesting.  We don't usually recommend mixing repos like that due to
> >possible API differences between versions of things like lucene.  Did
> >the Eclipse help system indexing work for you?  That's where it uses
> >lucene.
> 
> Hee ... I have to say I haven't actually used the Eclipse help for
> probably several years now. (Typical programmer, never actually reads
> the documentation ... :) ) I remember it used to pop up a Mozilla
> window that I disliked.

It'll still do that :)  If you do end up trying it with lucene 1.9, try
searching for something.  If you haven't done this before, it'll
probably build an index.  If that works, we're a large percentage of the
way towards using 1.9 instead of 1.4.3.

Thanks,

Andrew

Attachment: pgpveJ56aqps9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux