Hi, * Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-10 05:46]: > Just curious why the latest eclipse-platform in FC6 update-testing > requires lucene-devel in addition to lucene? Because eclipse.org ships a lucene-src jar that we wanted to symlink to. So our lucene package grew a lucene-devel which contains lucene-src to which we can symlink from the Eclipse SDK. > When I tried to update this morning, I got hit by the fact that lucene > is 1.9.1 in jpackage and 1.4.3 in Fedora, and jpackage doesn't have a > separate -devel subpackage; had to force-downgrade and exclude lucene > from jpackage to make this work. So you've been using the JPackage lucene with Fedora Eclipse? Interesting. We don't usually recommend mixing repos like that due to possible API differences between versions of things like lucene. Did the Eclipse help system indexing work for you? That's where it uses lucene. > I've bugzilla'd the out-of-date lucene in Fedora: We'll have to make sure the new version works with Eclipse. ISTR it not compiling against it but I guess we should investigate. Upstream is reluctant to move their dependencies forward like this. Andrew
Attachment:
pgpZrrFhDdeYH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
