On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 11:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310 > raised the issue that apparently, Atomic Host isn't "release blocking". > I think we have plenty of resources to match whatever criteria > there are for that for Fedora 27. Thoughts? I'd just like to point to my full comment in that bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310#c11 for me, it doesn't make much sense just to ask the narrow question "should Atomic be release blocking", because I don't think we have a good answer as to exactly what that would/should *mean*. I think it'd be more useful to have a slightly wider discussion about how it would make the most sense to deliver Atomic bits during the pre-release phase, and then from there, consider how the overall release process can maybe be adapted to accommodate that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
