Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/23/2017 11:14 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310
>> raised the issue that apparently, Atomic Host isn't "release blocking".
>> I think we have plenty of resources to match whatever criteria
>> there are for that for Fedora 27.   Thoughts?
>
> First off, thank you for not proposing this for f26.
>
> I think we should weigh the pros and cons. Some of which have become
> apparent to me during the past few weeks since f26 branched. There are
> some benefits to having us not be included in the alpha process and
> there are some negatives. I think this might best be served as a
> ticket in our tracker so that we can have a discussion there and
> ultimately make a decision.

For those not already aware, for F27 and forward there won't be an
Alpha release.  It's being removed.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha

josh
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux