Atomic openQA result emails ('compose check report')

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks!

So Colin and I had a bit of a chat about openQA Atomic testing
'integration', and one of the things that came up was the state of the
'compose check report' emails for Atomic tests.

If you're signed up to test@ or devel@ you may have noticed that a
'compose check report' mail is sent out for every mainline Fedora
compose openQA tests, with info on the numbers of passed and failed
tests and some other stuff.

When we set up openQA to test the Atomic Host OStree installer image
and to test the nightly 'two-week Atomic' composes, I asked whether we
should generate those mails, and who they should go to.

The answer I got - and the way it's configured right now - was that
people only wanted the mails produced when a test *failed*, and they
should be mailed to this list plus to one person directly (I think at
first it was Adam Miller, it now seems to be Mike McGrath).

I've just verified that this is actually working: when openQA tests the
 'two-week Atomic' composes and a failure occurs, the mail does get
sent. However, there hasn't been a failure of the test since - AFAICS -
2016-10-01. So that's why no such mails have been sent out recently. I
got Mike to check, and he actually did get a mail on 20167-10-01, when
the test last failed.

I think the mails that have been sent to cloud@ were never approved
through moderation, so they never actually appeared here. It'd be good
if a list moderator could check if they see a few 'compose check' mails
hung up in moderation, or something.

So, I just wanted to give a quick heads-up on that, and say that if
anyone would like that configuration changed, I can do it easily
enough. We could have a report generated for every compose as for the
'main' composes, but it'd be quite dull I think, because there's only
one test and it almost always passes. We can also change the list of
addresses that receive the mails when they're sent, if it should be
changed.

Also do let me know if running more tests on the Atomic installer image
would be desirable. For now we just run a single test - a straight-
through install test on x86_64 BIOS - since that's all I was asked for
initially. We could run the same test on UEFI, if desired, and we could
run some of the post-install tests that are run on other images, and we
could run some of the install variant tests; I just don't know which
ones are relevant / useful for the Atomic installer image.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux