[atomic-wg] Issue #228 `clarify policy on atomic host support for older Fedora "number" releases`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> @jbrooks
> I'd just like to clarify for anyone reading this that "rolling" doesn't mean rolling like rawhide or suse tumbleweed, unless the wheel you have in mind is giant and square and "turns" once each six months when a new fedora comes out.
> RHEL and CentOS atomic hosts "roll" from 7.1 to 7.2 to 7.3, etc. The user upgrades w/ atomic host upgrade and there's no rebasing or editing of repo config files required. When we talk about making fedora atomic a rolling release, this is the sort of rolling we're talking about. A very modest (and completely sensible, imo) sort of rolling.

you and @maxamillion should schedule that VFAD so we can flesh out this :) 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/228
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux