On 02/16/2017 08:51 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/08/2017 08:01 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> >>> After some discussions with mattdm and sgallagh about the cloud base >>> image and the server WG we have decided for now to leave the cloud >>> base image out of the server WG. Obviously it doesn't make sense to >>> have it stay as owned by the Atomic WG so here is what I would like to >>> propose: >>> >>> - Have the cloud base image owned by a CLOUD SIG >>> - Mainly members of the old CLOUD WG that care about the cloud >>> base image, including me. >>> - Create a new pagure issue tracker for the cloud sig. >> >> I received quite a few +1s for this so I went ahead and created the >> issue tracker in Pagure: >> >> https://pagure.io/cloud-sig > > There are a lot of changes going on around atomic, cloud, the WG, the > SIG, etc. Could I trouble someone to write up a blog post or mailing > list thread on devel (or both!) that covers what the current plan is > and the direction going forward? For those that aren't working in > this space day to day, it would be very helpful. Particularly for > groups that have to interact with both cloud and atomic from time to > time, like rel-eng and FESCo. Josh, yes there has been a lot of "talk" in this area. Basically we rebooted the cloud WG as the Atomic WG. There were some thoughts about the cloud base image moving to the Server WG and letting that WG own it, but we have decided for now to just keep the cloud base image inside of its own little SIG with a narrow focus. It is not one of the "top three" offerings from Fedora and will not be treated with as much importance (i.e. release blocking) as it was in the past. I can try to do a blog (maybe for the comm blog) but I don't have a lot of extra time right now. Maybe next week. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
