Am 16.02.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 02/08/2017 08:01 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> After some discussions with mattdm and sgallagh about the cloud base >>> image and the server WG we have decided for now to leave the cloud >>> base image out of the server WG. Obviously it doesn't make sense to >>> have it stay as owned by the Atomic WG so here is what I would like to >>> propose: >>> >>> - Have the cloud base image owned by a CLOUD SIG >>> - Mainly members of the old CLOUD WG that care about the cloud >>> base image, including me. >>> - Create a new pagure issue tracker for the cloud sig. >> I received quite a few +1s for this so I went ahead and created the >> issue tracker in Pagure: >> >> https://pagure.io/cloud-sig > There are a lot of changes going on around atomic, cloud, the WG, the > SIG, etc. Could I trouble someone to write up a blog post or mailing > list thread on devel (or both!) that covers what the current plan is > and the direction going forward? For those that aren't working in > this space day to day, it would be very helpful. Particularly for > groups that have to interact with both cloud and atomic from time to > time, like rel-eng and FESCo. also for outsiders. I originally subscribed to this cloud@ mailinglist because of interest in cloud-base vagrant images and now realized this cloud is more atomic. - Thomas _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
