Am 03.02.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Matthew Miller: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base >> than atomic for vagrant. > Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough > downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you search > for "Fedora". Google Search: Fedora Atomic * (1st hit: www.projectatomic.io/) * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/ * click: download now * click: vagrant downloads * click: View downloads using vagrant tools Google Search: Fedora Cloud * (first hit: fedora atomic (https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/)) * 2nd hit: https://getfedora.org/de/cloud/download (redirect to https://alt.fedoraproject.org/de/cloud/) * no information about howto use with vagrant directly, only possiblity to download or "Want try Atomic" link at the bottom. Google Search: Fedora * Fedora Atomic "sub-link" (category link? don't know how they are called) on first hit * no Fedora Cloud on first page IMHO: * Even search for Fedora Cloud brings Atomic on top * better information about Atomic then for cloud base (for vagrant use case) Conclusion: i don't think downloads for cloud base are better because of people searching find it better. > > Is there any way to get download numbers over time? That would be very > interesting. I think the future is containers. but right now most people are still not ready to start full containerization. Another question is if people are using vagrant with Atomic. I use it to run tests. if possible i run tests in docker because of lower overhead - I would not use vagrant to start an Atomic vm to run a container in it I think. - Thomas _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
