Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
>> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's meeting. I
>> will try to put those down here, if anyone wants to add to that list, or
>> explain things better, please go ahead and reply to the thread :)
>>
>> * If we rename how to make sure that the users know that we are not
>>   abandoning the cloud?
>>
>> * If we create a new group, then who else are still interested about
>>   helping out the Cloud WG?
>>
>> * We will require new user stories related to Atomic. This also brings
>>  in the question about old user stories in current PRD. They are still
>>  mostly valid. PRD updation is surely one major point towards Atomic WG.
>>
>> * Who will maintain Atomic workstation? If it is workstation wg, then
>>   how to reduce duplication of efforts?
>>
>> * What will happen to the Cloud Base image?
>>
>> * Who will maintain the Vagrant images?
>>
>> * What will happen to our effort to push Fedora to different public
>>   cloud services? We have AMI(s) right now, we also push to Digital
>>   Ocean.
>
> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as
> concerned with these specific questions.
>
> I think the deeper problem is that there needs to be (I think) a person
> who is clearly identified to lead this effort (and ultimately this group).
> I think a lot of times it is hard for contributors to make meaningful
> contributions because the group is scattered and there is not really any
> one person to ask for a definitive answer on things. Sometimes a user will
> get a response back to a question/request/contribution, and sometimes not.
> I'm not saying we need one person to do all of the work, or to even be
> the expert in every area, but one person to at least know who is responsible
> for each part and to track down when things don't get done.
>
> As a group we haven't been very thorough and that has led to some
> serious issues with some of our shipped bits at times. To be honest I
> think we just need some dedicated leadership. Someone who crosses the
> Ts and dots the Is and greases the skids so that it is easy to on-board
> and make contributions. Hopefully this would lead to increased contribution
> activity and a more vibrant community.

This is sort of what I've been doing w/ CentOS Atomic, and I can do
the same w/ Fedora Atomic -- there's a lot of overlap.

Jason

>
> This is just my $.02.
>
> Dusty
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux