Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:07:08PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> One thing that has certainly been on my
> mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly
> into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more
> directly part of Fedora.  I'm not sure though, because we still need
> to maintain CentOS builds too.  Anyways this is a huge topic =)

I think that would probably help reduce the "too many things"
confusion, and it might make it easier to get resources attached more
directly to the Fedora work for areas that are currently bottlenecks
here.

And I think we can work directly with CentOS — we don't need to go
through a third party to play nicely together. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux