Re: Cloud Atomic ISO, missing items for baremetal usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52:43AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> >A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the
> >   hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt)
> >B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an
> >overlay
> >C. Getting all this stuff to work properly in SPCs
> >D. Something else?
> >
> >* so is software. *sigh*
> Does this mean there would be different hardware trees on the iso or
> that a basic iso would be pulling the appropriate tree via the
> network?

Well, for "A", I was thinking one for hardware, one for virt/cloud —
not going down the path of different trees for different types of
hardware, because that's definitely the road to madness.

For "B" (which is only theoretical, and as someone mentioned, may
require cloning Colin), there could be different overlays depending on
needs.

> What are SPCs?

Super-privileged containers. Basically, containers that are meant to
manage the host OS. See
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJIeGnHtIYg from DevConf.cz last year.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux