Matthew,
On 2015-12-16 01:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing
components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include
on the ISO? In my view a baremetal installation is first a server, so
it should have basic server tools.
The hardware enablement and configuration stuff needs to be available,
I agree. Unfortunately, after all of these years, hardware is still
terrible.* But I'm not sure stuffing every possible tool into Atomic is
the way to go. Options I can see are:
A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the
hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt)
B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an
overlay
C. Getting all this stuff to work properly in SPCs
D. Something else?
* so is software. *sigh*
Does this mean there would be different hardware trees on the iso or
that a basic iso would be pulling the appropriate tree via the network?
What are SPCs?
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
