On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 01:44:43PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 09/11/2015 11:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Since VirtualBox is the format the vast majority of Vagrant users will > > want, that's... kind of a big deal. *sigh* Options I can see here are: > > > > A) Scramble to find some way to do the VirtualBox testing. > > > > B) Don't publish the VirtualBox images. > > > > C) Publish the VirtualBox images, but put them in a Penalty Box with > > extra warnings > > > > Any other ideas? Preferences? B seems the most responsible, yet also > > the most sad. A would be highly unusual for our infrastructure. C could > > expose us to looking bad if support breaks and no one notices. > > Is there a way we can test it out-of-band? I'm willing to do some manual > testing as needed at least until we can come up with a longer term fix. > > A and/or C seem like the most useful options. B would be, as you say, sad. > So Lala and I have agreed to kind of head up the vagrant effort and get the images into Atlas. Although we didn't explicitly talk about it I think he is able to test VirtualBox while I am able to test Libvirt. This is manual testing for now but hopefully we can go with A/C as a result of this manual testing. Note: Lala is currently very sick but hopefully that won't last long. If we had other volunteers that would be great! Dusty _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
