On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:26:43AM -0400, James Antill wrote: > At least one view of the model is that you have atomic upgrades, and > thus. rollback/downgrades. This fits perfectly with the f21/f21/f23 > release model (although "rpm-ostree rebase" is very surprising when it > deletes your refs, you can still atomic downgrade). > Certainly one of the benefits of ostree, to me, is that it should be > possible to freely move between N stable releases. I agree. And since we're making the packages from which the Atomic versions will be composed, what's the _downside_ of making releases available as distinct releases? Since it's produced from RPMs that we're making automatically, isn't it basically something we can offer to users with very little effort? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
