On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 00:41 -0400, Michael Hampton wrote: > On 10/08/2014 12:26 AM, James Antill wrote: > > I would also disagree strongly that RHEL will ever follow this model. I > > would bet a huge amount of money that if customers are using the > > official trees at all then enough of them will be willing to pay for > > rhel8 after rhel9 goes live that it'll just happen. > > I'd also be willing to bet more than a few beers that if/when you > > propose to PM that "rpm-ostree upgrade" magically changes the client > > from rhel8 to rhel9 ... you will not be getting smiles and nods. > > Certainly not from 8 to 9. But I'd love to be able to do this from 8.1 to 8.2 to 8.3 etc. That's true, it's much more likely we'll be able to do just a single rhel8 release. Although, even then, while I've never wanted/needed to use a minor release personally, they presumably exist because of demand. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
