On 12/10/2013 08:45 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/10/2013 04:45 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: >>> Two short thoughts about this: >>> - do we really need to distinguish between public, private and hybrid >>> cloud? IMHO that shouldn't really matter for the image. >> >> It matters for the image format (AMI vs. qcow2, etc.) and may matter for >> packages that are included in the image as well. > > Why would it matter for the format? AMI or qcow2 both work in public, > private and hybrid clouds. Or am I missing something? AMI is preferred on Amazon. Don't think it's a supported format for CloudStack, not sure about OpenStack. I don't think you can directly import qcow2 to EC2. Also: we're already producing these images. I'm guessing we didn't do so randomly. > Any examples what should be different in terms of packages? I can't > think of anything that is public/private/hybrid specific. EC2 has its own tools that, IIRC, are bundled with the AMI. (ec2-utils) Not sure whether we can ship that package or not, I don't see it currently. -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
