On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/10/2013 04:45 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: >> Two short thoughts about this: >> - do we really need to distinguish between public, private and hybrid >> cloud? IMHO that shouldn't really matter for the image. > > It matters for the image format (AMI vs. qcow2, etc.) and may matter for > packages that are included in the image as well. Why would it matter for the format? AMI or qcow2 both work in public, private and hybrid clouds. Or am I missing something? Any examples what should be different in terms of packages? I can't think of anything that is public/private/hybrid specific. -- Sandro _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
