Re: Attention Cloud WG nominees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/10/13 14:56, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> Also I was kind of hoping that we'd never have to worry about running
> on bare metal, but maybe that's fantasy. :)
> 
Well, I was more thinking, if we're (as opposite to the server product)
the only ones running on bare metal, and of course, the desktop group
(most probable) too.

Because desktop is running on bare metal, I would expect, we don't need
to worry about bare metal issues first/at all.

pet-vs-cattle: I'd expect every server to be a cattle: made of a
description how to produce the service and a system image. I'd only
expect a few underlying "servers" below the infrastructure to be pets at
all. Especially compute nodes should be cattle here, the same applies to
storage nodes.

I'd expect, not so many people would agree here, since it aggressively
breaks with very traditional installs.
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux