-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 08:57 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 09/11/2013 08:53 AM, Sam Kottler wrote: > >>> It's not "disabl[ing] security", security groups already do >>> that for you. You're adding an extra convoluted layer, and the >>> vast majority of users will just disable it and rely on >>> security groups (that's conjecture on my part). Have you ever >>> heard about vulnerabilities in the AWS security group >>> implementation? I haven't. > > I would figure Amazon would do everything in its power to prevent > leakage of information about vulnerabilities to the public. Their > stock price would take a large hit... [I hope the quoting is correct there, but it looks odd to me. Apologies if it's wrong.] And, they may be under court order to not discuss their vulnerabilities! But seriously: I'd rather this work the same way other Fedora installations work. I don't have to enable the firewall when I install from DVDs, and I'd like the same thing to apply to cloud images. Otherwise I need to modify my post-install scripts to always enable the firewall (or maybe conditionally do it, which is worse). Eric. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSMHtTAAoJENxauZFcKtNxkUcIAJV5glS4VNT9qhWWgG3UoVou uXxO4TSde8/sVnUNQY3vjmHE6XcPoiLkLjCq9nk8RWvJbmrErOiclsKLRo6E7UZL Fs9CE/aX+6JhzgTZzxoAvayhUSKtwZIDFfvXjUldH1YWMB9gj/ZPms1sDqoiH3Xb /qEt9sXmKDNFJgYGAYCvevk53c75pd4upt1UJ2fLxTezBUf7vi3o6129Fw6KNx7Z zhnyYtmfcesrmZog7lFHAZto1/qSkWIHZaY8XuO5lauEcxdiBMJUYgCWjrWu1y3a GemzbwniBKawfX/t7OIRqyWYoRKJjaHEPZswbHP33jdieCllsMwpujeRJl8q+jA= =yJ/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
