On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:54:50PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:24:17AM -0800, graziano obertelli wrote: > > Also, we do have already some spec file that we use. I did try it on > > fedora and it created RPMs, but I haven't done any Q&A on them (we are > > busy with 1.6.2 process at this time). So they are working, but what we > > did there is to ship all the java dependencies in them instead of creating > > packages for them. Is this something acceptable for fedora? > > We're going to have to build them separately. Hopefully, that won't be a big > deal. It doesn't look like it should be. My two concerns are: the axis2 > version provided is slightly old, and the rampartc package has some changes > from upstream. We'll have to figure out the right way to deal with both of > those. We do currently use 1.6.0 (which is current I think) with upstream. And for the patches, we have some patches which upstream gave us to fix a memory leak we encounterd. We didn't yet include them for lack of time: you may want to contact upstream too, I think they would be very happy to have axis2c and rampartc in fedora. cheers graziano > > > > -- > Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> > Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services > Computing & Information Technology > Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -- Graziano Obertelli Eucalyptus Systems, Inc. 130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117 Office: 805-845-8000 www.eucalyptus.com
