On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:24:17AM -0800, graziano obertelli wrote: > Also, we do have already some spec file that we use. I did try it on > fedora and it created RPMs, but I haven't done any Q&A on them (we are > busy with 1.6.2 process at this time). So they are working, but what we > did there is to ship all the java dependencies in them instead of creating > packages for them. Is this something acceptable for fedora? We're going to have to build them separately. Hopefully, that won't be a big deal. It doesn't look like it should be. My two concerns are: the axis2 version provided is slightly old, and the rampartc package has some changes from upstream. We'll have to figure out the right way to deal with both of those. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Computing & Information Technology Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
