Re: Iraf fork?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Michaël Ughetto wrote:
2008/5/26 Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote:

Sergio Pascual wrote:
If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF
in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i
do not consider the waiting solution )
Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others.
Sadly true that it's our last solution.
An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead
package it up for RPM Fusion (

While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for
Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go
ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible.

It looks like a good compromise. But it must be considered only as a
*temporary* solution.

Yes, but sadly we won't be able to use it in our spin anyway due to licensing issues.

Marek Mahut     
Fedora Project                         

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Fedora astronomy mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Scitech]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [NASA]

  Powered by Linux