2008/5/26 Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote: > >>Sergio Pascual wrote: >>>> If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF >>>> in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i >>>> do not consider the waiting solution ) >>> >>> Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others. >> >>Sadly true that it's our last solution. > > An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead > package it up for RPM Fusion (rpmfusion.org). > > While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for > Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go > ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible. > It looks like a good compromise. But it must be considered only as a *temporary* solution. -- Michael Ughetto (Telimektar) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MichaelUghetto <telimektar1er@xxxxxxxxx> || <telimektar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 0x8ECBA2A4 on pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ Fedora astronomy mailing list Fedora-astronomy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-astronomy-list
