On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote: >Sergio Pascual wrote: >>> If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF >>> in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i >>> do not consider the waiting solution ) >> >> Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others. > >Sadly true that it's our last solution. An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead package it up for RPM Fusion (rpmfusion.org). While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible. _______________________________________________ Fedora astronomy mailing list Fedora-astronomy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-astronomy-list
