Re: Iraf fork?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:12:39 +0200, you wrote:

>Sergio Pascual wrote:
>>> If I understood well, our better (and only ?) option if we want IRAF
>>> in Fedora is to push it to our trac server and work hard, right ? ( i
>>> do not consider the waiting solution )
>> Yes, that's my opinion. But I would like to hear some others.
>Sadly true that it's our last solution.

An alternative is to not include iraf in Fedora directly but instead
package it up for RPM Fusion (

While obviously not ideal it does at least get iraf packaged for
Fedora, and a project to replace the non-free bits could still go
ahead without the pressure of getting iraf in as soon as possible.

Fedora astronomy mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Scitech]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [NASA]

  Powered by Linux