Il giorno sab 10 apr 2021 alle ore 13:24 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > I don't know what Purism is doing, they've made some choices around > their HW which is frankly quite strange, I've stated this before [1], > and attempted to cover up the fact the HW needs various firmware to > work by masking them and doing, or at least attempting to do and I > have no idea if those experiments worked out or not, weird things in > the early boot process to setup the SoC. It was at that point I > stopped following what they were doing. > I know the article, I read it some time ago. > I'm aware of at least one person reporting that they had booted Fedora > on the device, they asked me if I could enable some drivers for some > of the sensors, I have no idea how they achieved it etc. > > Like with all these early devices we can assist where possible but > there's an expectation of some level of being able to deal with the > very early low level booting of arm devices yourself because debugging > these devices over email or IRC is difficult. > Yes, it's not a "well known" PC. What about [1]? What's the plan of Fedora Mobility SIG? Who is taking care of it? I suppose since there is an empty link, someone wants to fill it... Cheers [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Librem5 _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
