Re: aarch64 testing enabled in openQA production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Adam and Peter,

these are really great news!

Do you guys also have plans to enable some bare metal tests for some
supported boards for aarch64?


Cheers,

Dan

Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi folks!
>
> A few of you have seen this already, but just wanted to send out a
> wider announcement: having been deservedly shamed by pbrobinson, I
> spent most of this week working on aarch64 testing in openQA, and am
> happy to announce that:
>
> * Quite a few existing issues in tests have been fixed
> * Testing coverage has been enhanced a lot to cover the Minimal, Server
> and Workstation disk images, with the full set of Base tests run on
> each
> * aarch64 testing is now enabled on the production openQA instance!
>
> We've had testing running on the lab (formerly known as staging)
> instance for a long time now, and I've been meaning to also enable it
> on production for over a year, but it kept getting delayed by this and
> that (most recently, the infra move). But now it's done.
>
> The consequences of this - beyond, of course, that you can now see
> aarch64 tests in the production openQA web UI - should be that the
> aarch64 results show up in the "compose check report" emails, and will
> also show up in the validation wiki pages, just like x86_64 results.
> openQA should fill in quite a lot of boxes in the Installation, Base
> and Cloud pages for future validation events, taking some of the test
> load off of manual testers. Next week I intend to enable most of the
> Desktop tests on the Workstation disk image too.
>
> I have not enabled updates testing yet, because we just don't have the
> capacity, unfortunately. If we can get more testing capacity we could
> do this.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux