Re: FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:16 PM
> To: Timothy Krantz; arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)
> 
> 
> On 07/22/2014 01:06 PM, Timothy Krantz wrote:
> > Oops forgot to send to the list
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Timothy Krantz [mailto:tkrantz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:03 AM
> > To: 'Pete Travis'
> > Subject: RE:  Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Fedora ARM hackers,
> >
> > I'm shopping around for a device to provide basic routing and firewall
> functions.
> >
> > The goal is to provide remote access to an IP camera through satellite
> internet connection.  To keep the camera and link from getting buried or
> abused, I want to limit access to connections from a particular /25. If using a
> dynamic IP, the satellite modem uses NAT and does not offer firewall or port
> forwarding capability.  If using a static IP, a public IP is routed directly to the
> inside device, without a firewall.
> >
> > I'm thinking a small multipurpose ARM device would be a cost effective
> solution.  Any problems that can't be resolved via ssh will be dealt with by
> post or remote hands, so it must be fairly reliable, not require user
> intervention to survive power cycles, etc.  I'd like a dual Ethernet device, but
> a USB nic could do.  There will need to be a case or finished chassis of some
> sort, preferably one that could protect that second NIC from accidental
> disconnection or tampering.
> >
> > Is there anything on the market that fits the bill, or am I better off with
> some OpenWRT supported consumer router, or maybe something else?
> >
> > --Pete
> >
> >
> >
> > You might want to take a look at the Dreamplug or Mirabox from
> globalscale.  They both have dual Ethernet and cases.  I use both for exactly
> the reasons you want.  I have run fedora on both but currently run slackware
> on both for reasons clear only to me.
> 
> Both these and the freescale boxes are out of my price range.  So I am
> sticking with the Cubieboard and adding the USB ethernet.
> 
> I MIGHT be willing to pay that price if it had 1+4 ethernet to make it a router.
> 

I believe the OP mentioned that he wanted a "case" or enclosure.  I was not aware that the cubieboard had one available.

Tim


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux