> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:14 PM > To: Timothy Krantz > Cc: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT) > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Timothy Krantz > <tkrantz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oops forgot to send to the list > > > > > > > > From: Timothy Krantz [mailto:tkrantz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:03 AM > > To: 'Pete Travis' > > Subject: RE: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT) > > > > > > > > Hello Fedora ARM hackers, > > > > I'm shopping around for a device to provide basic routing and firewall > > functions. > > > > The goal is to provide remote access to an IP camera through satellite > > internet connection. To keep the camera and link from getting buried > > or abused, I want to limit access to connections from a particular > > /25. If using a dynamic IP, the satellite modem uses NAT and does not > > offer firewall or port forwarding capability. If using a static IP, a > > public IP is routed directly to the inside device, without a firewall. > > > > I'm thinking a small multipurpose ARM device would be a cost effective > > solution. Any problems that can't be resolved via ssh will be dealt > > with by post or remote hands, so it must be fairly reliable, not > > require user intervention to survive power cycles, etc. I'd like a > > dual Ethernet device, but a USB nic could do. There will need to be a > > case or finished chassis of some sort, preferably one that could > > protect that second NIC from accidental disconnection or tampering. > > > > Is there anything on the market that fits the bill, or am I better off > > with some OpenWRT supported consumer router, or maybe something > else? > > > > --Pete > > > > > > > > You might want to take a look at the Dreamplug or Mirabox from > globalscale. > > They both have dual Ethernet and cases. I use both for exactly the > > reasons you want. I have run fedora on both but currently run > > slackware on both for reasons clear only to me. > > The dreamplug is only ARMv5 so is unsupported. I have a mirabox and it does > work but it has a terrible uboot from the last decade so doesn't support > device tree OOTB so there's hacks needed to support booting and it's not > particularly pretty, not something I would recommend particularly to deal > with remote support. > > Peter The mirabox u-boot is indeed old and does not support "un-appended" device tree, that is true. It does work fine with the, albeit ugly, appended device tree. Mine is running 3.16-rc6 with an appended device tree right now. Tim _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
