Re: FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/22/2014 01:24 PM, Timothy Krantz wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:16 PM
To: Timothy Krantz; arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  FW: Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)


On 07/22/2014 01:06 PM, Timothy Krantz wrote:
Oops forgot to send to the list



From: Timothy Krantz [mailto:tkrantz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:03 AM
To: 'Pete Travis'
Subject: RE:  Simple routing device advice (mildly OT)



Hello Fedora ARM hackers,

I'm shopping around for a device to provide basic routing and firewall
functions.
The goal is to provide remote access to an IP camera through satellite
internet connection.  To keep the camera and link from getting buried or
abused, I want to limit access to connections from a particular /25. If using a
dynamic IP, the satellite modem uses NAT and does not offer firewall or port
forwarding capability.  If using a static IP, a public IP is routed directly to the
inside device, without a firewall.
I'm thinking a small multipurpose ARM device would be a cost effective
solution.  Any problems that can't be resolved via ssh will be dealt with by
post or remote hands, so it must be fairly reliable, not require user
intervention to survive power cycles, etc.  I'd like a dual Ethernet device, but
a USB nic could do.  There will need to be a case or finished chassis of some
sort, preferably one that could protect that second NIC from accidental
disconnection or tampering.
Is there anything on the market that fits the bill, or am I better off with
some OpenWRT supported consumer router, or maybe something else?
--Pete



You might want to take a look at the Dreamplug or Mirabox from
globalscale.  They both have dual Ethernet and cases.  I use both for exactly
the reasons you want.  I have run fedora on both but currently run slackware
on both for reasons clear only to me.

Both these and the freescale boxes are out of my price range.  So I am
sticking with the Cubieboard and adding the USB ethernet.

I MIGHT be willing to pay that price if it had 1+4 ethernet to make it a router.

I believe the OP mentioned that he wanted a "case" or enclosure.  I was not aware that the cubieboard had one available.

I got a Cubieboard 2, case, and power supply from iotllc for $60. Shipped in 2 days.

Yes, I had to 'put it together'. I had to stick the heatsink on the SOC and snap the card into the case and screw on the cover.

If you want a case to include a drive, then you need a makerbot. Though the Cubietruck case has room for a drive AND a battery.


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux