Re: Improved support for BeagleBone (Black) for Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jason Kridner
> <jkridner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Did you know that BeagleBone Black is *true* open hardware? This means
>> that people can readily take the design and make their own custom
>> changes to it even prototyping it in low quantities, such as being
>> supported for the upcoming Arduino TRE. The same can't be said for
>> some other boards in the same price range also looking to get Linux in
>> the hands of more people.
>>
>> It is also $35 to distributors and those including it in other open
>> hardware projects.
>>
>> OK, it might not have been best for me to start with a sales pitch,
>> but it seems to me a lot of people aren't aware.
>
> People are aware.  There have been several dozen handed out at various
> Fedora events.
>
>> I'd like to figure out who has interest in improving Fedora support on
>> BeagleBone Black and what I can do to help them. We have a running
>> image of Fedora...
>
> Peter Robinson and Kyle McMartin have been poking at getting it
> booting recently.
>
>> First and foremost, support needs to be in the Fedora mainline, not on
>> a remix. I'd be very happy if I was copied on any blocking issues in
>> that regard so that I can help get them addressed.
>
> Getting all the relevant kernel patches upstream would go a long way
> towards getting everything in Fedora mainline.  Particularly in a
> multiboard fashion.

Understood. This is the priority and I've probably missed the most
critical e-mail traffic on the upstream kernel lists. I'm trying to
escalate any blocking issues with upstream support to the right folks
at TI if they aren't already aware of any outstanding issues. It seems
the USB support is the last major hurdle, but I'm told by the TI team
that it is working in the staging tree. I'm trying to track down now
if all the right patches are indeed staged at an upstream maintainer
or not (as I might not have completely understood and I'd like to know
exactly where they are staged if someone wants to bring them in
early).
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux