On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did you know that BeagleBone Black is *true* open hardware? This means > that people can readily take the design and make their own custom > changes to it even prototyping it in low quantities, such as being > supported for the upcoming Arduino TRE. The same can't be said for > some other boards in the same price range also looking to get Linux in > the hands of more people. > > It is also $35 to distributors and those including it in other open > hardware projects. > > OK, it might not have been best for me to start with a sales pitch, > but it seems to me a lot of people aren't aware. People are aware. There have been several dozen handed out at various Fedora events. > I'd like to figure out who has interest in improving Fedora support on > BeagleBone Black and what I can do to help them. We have a running > image of Fedora... Peter Robinson and Kyle McMartin have been poking at getting it booting recently. > First and foremost, support needs to be in the Fedora mainline, not on > a remix. I'd be very happy if I was copied on any blocking issues in > that regard so that I can help get them addressed. Getting all the relevant kernel patches upstream would go a long way towards getting everything in Fedora mainline. Particularly in a multiboard fashion. josh _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
