----- Original Message ----- > From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > To: Sean Omalley <omalley_s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:33 AM > Subject: Re: Kernel 3.8 plans > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Sean Omalley <omalley_s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> good info. >> >> I just started building the 3.8rc2 for kirkwood based on the > config-3.6.10-6.fc18.armv5tel.kirkwood. >> only one patch needed to be added so far. It imported without prompting for > any extra features. However, >> I doubt this platform is the unified kernel... (?) > > Nope, not part of unified. Unified is only currently for v7 hardware. > I've not seen any need for any patches based on the kirkwood 3.7 > kernel as yet. The armv5 kernels at this point are pretty static and I > expect them to remain as such. I don't expect many changes either, but with the other changes going on, things might still break.. >> From my understanding the native tegra3 support didnt make it into 3.8 > kernel... it had to wait until 3.9. (?) > The core tegra3 support landed upstream a few releases ago so I'm not > sure what you're referring too. I was getting tegra 3 and tegra 4 mixed up. :) The tegra 4 patches didn't make it into the 3.8 kernel. :) _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
